Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 00:01
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Knicks' Decision to Fire Tom Thibodeau Was Brewing For 'Months' - Sports Illustrated
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
What’s a mistake most guys make when trying to get a girlfriend?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Thank you.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
What’s next?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
What are some of the most annoying movie clichés?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Taylor Swift Owns Two Versions of Four Albums. Now What? - Billboard
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?